Apr 092011

A budding designer in China has invented a new parasitic power generator!   Called the T-BOX, this thing is supposed to sit between the ties on a high-speed rail line and generate power from the wind.

So we use coal to make electricity to get a train to move to make wind and then use that wind to make electricity again!  This strikes me as an extremely expensive way to generate a little bit of power at the cost of reducing the energy efficiency of passing trains.

I’ve got a better idea:  make sure that the rail bed is as smooth as possible, or let’s say as aerodynamic as possible to minimize the drag on the train, and cover it with photovoltaics  so that it generates electricity when the train isn’t there.  That means that 99% of the day time at least, you’ll generate power, not just the 1% of the time that a train happens to come by.

But if he’s got a clever turbine design, then you could mount the thing with the axis vertically in urban locations to generate power from the wind blasting between buildings.

 Posted by at 7:46 am
Dec 142009

So a while ago I was thinking of a clever noise abatement system for highways.   You could turn all that noise into electrical energy, maybe use it to power street lights.  Then I realized that it’s not completely free, I mean apart from all the hardware and transmission lines etc that you’d need to make it work.  There’s a risk that you’d actually reduce the fuel efficiency of the cars on the road.  I think there’s a risk that all the noise abatement systems in place already do that.   If you hem in a car with walls, then the air around the car is not as free to move, so the pressure must be higher.  And remember you can’t have it both ways:  it can’t be an insignificant loss if there’s a significant gain.

Then I read about somebody trying to harvest energy from crowds.  Now, imagine how tired you’d be when you got home after spending an afternoon in a shopping mall.   The energy would be sucked out of the bounce in your step.   This energy was meant to propel you forward, but a small bit of it got converted into light.  Is that free energy?  Not sure.  In order to produce that little spurt of power, you needed to eat something.  That food likely took an enormous amount of energy to produce.  It may be cheaper to rely on fossil fuel directly, or, heaven forbid, tile the enormous roof of that mall with solar panels interspersed with sky lights.  You could use solar energy to power huge moving walkways that would allow people to rest while shopping, they already have those in airports (although not solar powered that I know of).  Of course, we’re supposed to exercise, and burn off energy, but walking through an airport or a shopping mall is not usually considered an exercise regimen.  Now if they harnessed all the energy put into running tracks and weight lifting that might be a good idea.  But then we might need to subsidize the athletes’ food bills.   At least somebody would get a free lunch!

Now I hear of somebody who wants to use the turbulent wake of your car to charge your cell phone.  I can’t help but think that this is going to introduce drag and be less efficient than just using the power generated by the alternator that’s attached to the engine.  Heck, why not mould a solar panel into the body of your car and use that to charge your cell phone?  That could even charge your phone when you’re not moving, or charge your hybrid’s battery while you work.

Now piezoelectric cells that run off wind power might be a great idea in other places.  Like when I ride my bike to work, burning off all that expensive food.  There are invariably bits of my clothing that flap in the wind, at least they could help keep my mp3 player running, or power my lights.  Or if you happen to live in a windy place, perhaps this could lead to more compact wind power generation, stuff that doesn’t involve erecting a 60 foot mast next to your house.

Of course just because the application that drives somebody to develop a new technology is impractical, this doesn’t mean that the resulting technology is silly.

 Posted by at 11:47 pm